Your postcode is used only to lookup your parliamentary constituency and is not stored
Share your voter power

In Eastleigh, each person has 0.1563 votes

Voters in Eastleigh have 1x less voting power than the average UK voter.

Eastleigh ranks 216 out of 650 constituencies in the UK


32,502 voters couldn't help their preferred party in Eastleigh in 2019:

  • 23,861 people did not vote for the winning candidate. Under a proportional system, these votes could have helped their preferred party in another constituency.
  • The winning Conservative candidate only needed 17,070 votes to beat the second-placed Liberal Democrat candidate. Under a proportional system the 8,641 surplus votes they received could have been used to help Conservative candidates in other constituencies.

It doesn't have to be like this

Under a proportional electoral system, every vote can count. There are many systems available and they are widely used in other countries, in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. They're even used for internal elections in the House of Commons. So why can't every vote count when we elect MPs?

What do the parties say about electoral reform?

To be updated as manifestos are published

  • Conservatives "We will retain the first past the post system for voting for parliamentary elections" (2017 manifesto)
  • Labour No specific policy (2019 manifesto)
  • Liberal Democrats "Put an end to wasted votes, by introducing proportional representation through the Single Transferable Vote for electing MPs, and local councillors in England." (2019 manifesto)
  • Green Party "Replace the First Past the Post system for parliamentary elections with a fair and proportional voting system." (2019 manifesto)
  • Reform UK (Brexit Party) Supports a proportional system for electing MPs (2019 manifesto)
  • Scottish National Party "We support the replacement of the first-past-the-post system with proportional representation for elections to the House of Commons." (2017 manifesto)
  • Plaid Cymru "...reform the voting system so that it is more representative." (2017 manifesto)